Jobber

$29 · 4.1/5

FieldPulse

$85 · 4.3/5

At-a-glance comparison

JobberFieldPulseWinner
Entry price$29/mo (Core, 1 user)~$85/mo base (indicative)🟢 Jobber
5-tech cost$149/mo (Connect team)~$160/mo (base + 4 seats)🟢 Jobber (slightly)
10-tech cost$299/mo (Grow team)~$220/mo (base + 9 seats)🟢 FieldPulse
Pricing transparency✅ All 4 tiers published❌ US quote-based🟢 Jobber
Free trial14 days, no credit cardSales-call required🟢 Jobber
Onboarding time24-48 hours1-2 weeks🟢 Jobber
Offline mode✅ Native, documented🟢 FieldPulse
Equipment tracking❌ Job-based notes✅ 600 custom forms🟢 FieldPulse
Multi-location✅ Included at base🟢 FieldPulse
QuickBooks syncConnect tier ($99/mo)Included at base🟢 FieldPulse
Open API accessHigher tiersIncluded at base🟢 FieldPulse
G2 rating4.54.7 (343 reviews)🟢 FieldPulse
Capterra rating4.54.6 (340 reviews)🟢 FieldPulse
iOS app rating4.8 ★Strong (sparse data)🟢 Jobber (volume)
Android app rating4.4 ★Strong~Tie
Marketing automationAdd-on $79/moThinner🟢 Jobber
Contract termsMonth-to-monthMonth-to-month🟰 Tie

Score: Jobber wins on 7 criteria. FieldPulse wins on 8. Tie on 2. The choice depends on which criteria match your operation’s priorities.

Methodology

This comparison uses verified data from four sources:

  1. Jobber pricing verified at getjobber.com/pricing as of May 14, 2026
  2. FieldPulse pricing from FieldPulse NZ public pricing page (US is quote-based — figures are indicative)
  3. Contractor sentiment from r/HVAC, r/Contractor, r/FieldService, r/FSMSoftware
  4. G2 and Capterra verified ratings for both products

No content is sponsored. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no cost to you. Read our disclosure.

Pricing comparison (the real numbers)

This is where the two products differ most clearly on procurement experience — though final cost at mid-scale ends up roughly comparable.

Jobber pricing (fully published)

PlanSolo (1 user)Team
Core$29/mo
Connect$99/mo$149/mo (5 users)
Grow$149/mo$299/mo (10 users)
Plus$529/mo (15 users)

All four tiers published. Comparison-shop on a spreadsheet.

FieldPulse pricing (US quote-based, NZ indicative)

FieldPulse does not publish US pricing. The closest public reference is FieldPulse New Zealand’s pricing page:

Cost math at different sizes

Solo HVAC operator:

5-tech HVAC shop:

10-tech HVAC shop:

The pattern: Jobber wins at solo/small scale. FieldPulse becomes more cost-competitive as team size grows, because the per-user add-on cost ($15) is lower than Jobber’s effective per-user cost in team tiers ($30/user at Grow team).

Procurement friction matters

Even when FieldPulse is cheaper at 10 techs, the procurement experience is significantly worse. You can’t put FieldPulse in a comparison spreadsheet without a sales call. For HVAC owners who do their own procurement (most under 10 techs), this is a real friction point that Jobber doesn’t impose.

Mobile app comparison

Both products have strong mobile experiences. The validated data favors Jobber on review volume.

Jobber mobile

FieldPulse mobile

The offline mode difference

This is the most consequential mobile difference between the two products.

FieldPulse’s offline mode is documented as a real product capability — the app automatically detects when you’ve lost connectivity, lets you continue working on customers/jobs/projects/estimates/invoices/custom forms, and syncs everything when you reconnect.

Jobber requires an active internet connection. Period. In basements, mechanical rooms, rural service routes, or any commercial property with weak coverage, Jobber stops working when the signal drops.

For HVAC techs doing residential service in well-covered suburban areas, this matters less. For HVAC techs doing commercial mechanical room work, rural service, or basement-heavy residential, this is a daily productivity issue with Jobber that doesn’t exist with FieldPulse.

Feature comparison

What both do well

What Jobber does better

What FieldPulse does better

What neither does well

What real HVAC contractors say

Jobber sentiment

“Been using jobber since we started the business. It’s amazing. 10/10 recommend. We have the grow plan and it’s worth every penny.” — HVAC business owner, r/HVAC

“I pay $267/month for jobber and they still want more money for basic features like reviews and referrals.” — Contractor, r/Contractor

FieldPulse sentiment

“If you lose internet connection while out in the field, you can continue using the FieldPulse mobile app in our Offline Mode.” — FieldPulse official documentation

“FieldPulse: 4.7 on G2 (343 reviews), 4.6 on Capterra (340 reviews).” — Reddit FSM compilation, r/FSMSoftware

The sentiment pattern

Jobber sentiment is high-volume and mixed — many satisfied users, frequent complaints about tier pricing creep, occasional dealbreakers (offline mode missing, equipment tracking weak).

FieldPulse sentiment is lower-volume but more uniformly positive on the platforms where it’s measured (G2, Capterra). The contractor critics on Reddit are thinner — partly because the user base is smaller, partly because users tend to be technical buyers who knew what they were buying.

For risk-averse buyers wanting heavy due diligence, Jobber has more public material to evaluate. For buyers prioritizing review platform scores, FieldPulse looks stronger.

When Jobber wins

Scenario: Solo HVAC operator or 1-3 tech shop

Pick Jobber. The cost math is unambiguous at small scale — $29-$99/mo vs FieldPulse’s ~$85+/mo base. You won’t use enough of FieldPulse’s depth to justify the premium.

Scenario: New to FSM software, want fastest setup

Pick Jobber. Self-serve onboarding in 24-48 hours vs FieldPulse’s 1-2 week vendor-assisted process. Test real workflows before committing.

Scenario: You hate sales calls during procurement

Pick Jobber. All four tiers published; you can build a procurement spreadsheet without engaging vendor sales. FieldPulse requires a sales conversation for US pricing.

Scenario: Marketing automation is part of your stack

Pick Jobber + Marketing Suite ($79/mo) or Grow tier. Built-in postcards, email campaigns, review automation. FieldPulse’s marketing tooling is thinner.

Scenario: You work mostly residential in well-covered suburban areas

Pick Jobber. Offline mode is FieldPulse’s biggest advantage. If you rarely lose signal, that advantage doesn’t apply to you. Don’t pay for capability you won’t use.

Scenario: Mixed iOS/Android crew where mobile reliability matters

Pick Jobber. Validated 4.8 iOS / 4.4 Android ratings give you confidence on both platforms. FieldPulse mobile is also strong but with less validated public data.

When FieldPulse wins

Scenario: You work in offline environments daily

Pick FieldPulse. This is FieldPulse’s primary differentiator and the most common reason contractors switch from Jobber. Basements, mechanical rooms, rural service routes — if signal drops are a daily reality, Jobber’s “no offline” becomes a daily productivity tax.

Scenario: You need per-equipment service history

Pick FieldPulse. Custom forms (600 total: 200 each for Jobs/Projects/Customers) enable structured per-equipment HVAC tracking — model, serial, refrigerant type, install date, service log. Jobber buries this in job notes, where it’s effectively unsearchable.

Scenario: Multi-location HVAC operation

Pick FieldPulse. Multi-location is a base feature, not an upgrade. Jobber doesn’t natively support multi-location workflows. If you’re running 2+ branches, FieldPulse is structurally better-suited.

Scenario: 10+ techs, cost-sensitive

Pick FieldPulse. At 10 techs, FieldPulse’s per-seat economics (~$15/user vs Jobber Grow team’s effective $30/user) starts to save real money. Combined with included QuickBooks sync and Open API, total value-per-dollar tilts to FieldPulse.

Scenario: Custom integrations needed (BI tools, proprietary systems)

Pick FieldPulse. Open API is included at base pricing. Jobber gates API access at higher tiers. For operations needing custom workflow integrations or data warehouse syncs, FieldPulse is structurally easier.

Scenario: You value G2/Capterra review platform validation

Pick FieldPulse. 4.7 G2 (343 reviews) and 4.6 Capterra (340 reviews) are among the highest in the FSM category. If review platform scores drive your due diligence, FieldPulse looks stronger.

The middle ground (5-10 techs, residential HVAC)

This is where most contractors get stuck on Jobber vs FieldPulse.

Default to Jobber unless one of these is true:

  1. You work in offline-heavy environments daily
  2. You need per-equipment service history (warranty tracking, refrigerant logs)
  3. You’re running multiple locations
  4. You need custom API integrations
  5. Pricing transparency is acceptable to you (you’re willing to engage sales)

If none of those apply, Jobber’s simpler procurement, faster onboarding, and stronger free trial experience win at this scale. The cost difference is small enough that the experience differences dominate.

If two or more apply, FieldPulse is likely the better fit.

Decision framework

Step 1: Do you work offline regularly?

Step 2: Do you need per-equipment service history?

Step 3: How many techs?

Step 4: How important is pricing transparency to you?

Step 5: Do you have time for a 1-2 week onboarding?

Frequently asked questions

Is Jobber or FieldPulse cheaper?

At solo/small scale (1-5 techs): Jobber is cheaper or comparable. At 10+ techs: FieldPulse is typically 20-30% cheaper based on indicative NZ pricing (~$220/mo vs Jobber’s $299/mo for 10 users).

Does FieldPulse really have offline mode?

Yes. Per FieldPulse’s official help center: the mobile app automatically switches to offline mode when out of cell range, lets you keep working on customers/jobs/projects/estimates/invoices/custom forms, and syncs when you reconnect. This is FieldPulse’s primary differentiator over Jobber and Housecall Pro.

Does Jobber publish FieldPulse-style pricing?

Yes — and this is one of Jobber’s clearest advantages over FieldPulse. Jobber publishes all four tiers (Core, Connect, Grow, Plus) with both solo and team pricing visible. FieldPulse requires a sales conversation for US pricing. For procurement-driven buyers, this is a meaningful friction difference.

Can I track HVAC equipment with Jobber?

Sort of, but poorly. Jobber tracks jobs, not equipment. You can put equipment info in job notes, but it’s not searchable as structured data and there’s no per-equipment service history view. FieldPulse’s custom forms (200 each for Jobs/Projects/Customers, 600 total) enable real structured equipment tracking.

Which has better mobile apps, Jobber or FieldPulse?

For validated public data, Jobber has stronger evidence — 4.8 iOS and 4.4 Android ratings with significant review volume. FieldPulse mobile is also strong (cross-validated by G2 4.7 scores), but App Store rating volume is sparser in public sources we could verify.

How long does FieldPulse onboarding take?

Typically 1-2 weeks with vendor-assisted setup. This is materially longer than Jobber’s 24-48 hour self-serve onboarding. For shops that need to be operational immediately, this is a real difference.

Does FieldPulse integrate with QuickBooks?

Yes, and QuickBooks sync is included in the base offering — not gated behind a higher tier like Jobber Connect ($99/mo). For shops where QB sync is the deciding factor, FieldPulse’s base offering is better-equipped at its starting price.

Can I get a FieldPulse free trial like Jobber?

A FieldPulse free trial is available, but you’ll need to engage with their sales team to start it. Jobber’s 14-day trial is self-serve, no credit card required. For low-friction evaluation, Jobber wins.

Is FieldPulse a better Jobber alternative than Housecall Pro?

Depends on the priority: If offline mode and equipment tracking are why you’d leave Jobber, FieldPulse is the better alternative. If marketing automation and iOS app polish are why you’d leave Jobber, Housecall Pro is the better alternative.

When should I switch from Jobber to FieldPulse?

Switch from Jobber to FieldPulse when one of these becomes a real pain: (1) you’re losing productivity to offline situations, (2) you need per-equipment service history for HVAC warranty or compliance work, (3) you’re opening a second location, or (4) you need custom API integrations. Below these triggers, stay with Jobber.

The bottom line

Jobber and FieldPulse are both credible choices for small-to-mid HVAC operations — but they’re optimizing for different things.

Jobber optimizes for simplicity and transparency. Cheapest entry price, fastest onboarding, fully published pricing, strong cross-platform mobile, best-in-class procurement experience. It’s the safe default for HVAC operations under 8 techs that don’t have specific operational complexity.

FieldPulse optimizes for operational depth. Native offline mode, equipment tracking via custom forms, multi-location support included, QuickBooks sync and Open API at base pricing, top G2/Capterra scores. It’s the right answer for HVAC operations with specific technical needs Jobber doesn’t address.

Neither is better in absolute terms. The right pick depends on whether your priority is “keep it simple and transparent” (Jobber) or “handle complex operational realities” (FieldPulse).

Try Jobber free for 14 days first → Start Jobber free trial (affiliate link)

Need offline mode or equipment tracking? → Request FieldPulse pricing (affiliate link)

For deeper analysis, read our full Jobber review and FieldPulse review.


Last updated: May 14, 2026. We update this comparison when pricing or features materially change.

Quick reference

Spec-level data straight from each vendor's published material — for buyers who want the structured view alongside the editorial.

Jobber vs FieldPulse — spec comparison
Feature Jobber FieldPulse
Starting price $29/mo $85/mo
Free trial 14 days, no credit card required Available — duration confirmed at sales call
Editor rating 4.1/5 4.3/5
HVAC fit (1–5) 3.9 4.5
Ease of use (1–5) 4.6 4.0
Best for Solo operators and HVAC teams of 1–10 technicians who need fast scheduling, mobile invoicing, and QuickBooks sync without enterprise complexity HVAC operations 3-25 technicians needing reliable offline mobile, deep equipment tracking, and multi-location management — buyers comfortable with quote-based pricing
Verdict recommended recommended

Read the full reviews